Book an audit
Perth · Western Australia · Solo

I find where a business loses money. Then I build the system to stop it.

Shopify development, custom websites, internal software and AI automation. I start with the problem, not the technology. Eight years building e-commerce, and I run my own store.

Reply inside one business day. No retainer required to start.

Diagram of a revenue path with four stages and four leak points Visitors enter at the top and pass through storefront, product page, checkout and follow-up. At each junction a branch drains away, labelled mobile friction, no answer, abandoned cart and lead goes cold. Visitors in Storefront A Mobile friction Product page B No answer Checkout C Abandoned cart Follow-up D Lead goes cold Revenue out
Fig. 01 — revenue path 4 junctions · 4 places money leaves
8+ yrsShopify development
15+ yrsLive-goods retail
50+Catalogue line items
SoloNo agency layer
Where the money goes

Three leaks show up in almost every business I open.

None of them look urgent on a dashboard. All of them compound. The audit exists to find which one costs you most.

Leak 01

Traffic arrives and leaves

Visitors reach the store. Most never reach checkout. The cause sits in mobile layout, unclear navigation, thin product pages or missing trust signals. Rarely in ad spend.

The fixGrowth Audit. Every blocker found, then ranked by revenue impact against build effort.
Leak 02

The same work repeats weekly

Support answers the same six questions. Order data gets re-typed into a spreadsheet. Reports get rebuilt by hand. Repetitive work grows with the business, and it eats the owner first.

The fixAI Business System. One expensive process rebuilt with defined sources and hard boundaries.
Leak 03

Good leads go quiet

A lead fills in the form. Nobody follows up on day three. The work goes to whoever replied first. Most businesses lose more revenue to silence than to price.

The fixCRM automation. Capture, score, route and follow up without anyone remembering to.
The leak meter instrument 01

Put a number on it.

Three leaks, priced per year. Pick a business shape if you do not know your figures, or open the sliders and use your own. Nothing gets sent anywhere, and nothing here is a promise.

Annual cost of doing nothing
What this uses

Loading assumptions.

These are typical starting assumptions, not measurements of your business. Switch to Use my numbers to replace every one of them.

Leak 01 conversion
200100,000
0.2%8%
A$20A$3,000
5%50%

Relative, not absolute. A 20% uplift moves a 1.4% rate to 1.68%.

Leak 02 repetitive work
040
A$25A$150

Use your own opportunity cost if the work lands on you.

20%90%
Leak 03 follow-up
0300

Count enquiries only. Completed orders sit in leak 01.

0%80%
A$50A$10,000
5%60%

01  visitors × 12 × conversion × uplift × order value   ·   02  hours × 52 × hourly cost × automatable share   ·   03  leads × 12 × ignored share × close rate × job value
Estimates only. Every figure stays in your browser.
The offer ladder entry at A$299

Four ways in. Start at the smallest one.

Pricing below is a starting range in Australian dollars. Scope, integrations and third-party costs move the number, and I confirm those before quoting.

Start here
Step 1

Growth Audit

A$299

Find the blockers before spending on a build.

  • Mobile, homepage, navigation, product pages, trust
  • Conversion blockers and automation openings
  • Ranked by impact against effort
  • Fee credited toward the build
Step 2

Growth Sprint

A$1,500–3,000

Fix one contained problem, fast.

  • Product page or template rebuild
  • Mobile conversion work
  • Lead capture or CRM workflow
  • Fixed scope, fixed price
Step 3

AI Business System

A$3,000–6,000

Rebuild one expensive process.

  • Support, qualification, quoting or reporting
  • Defined sources, no uncontrolled decisions
  • Human approval where it matters
  • Logging and escalation built in
Step 4

Operations System

A$10,000+

Run the business on one system.

  • Web, commerce, CRM, dashboards and AI
  • Custom where off-the-shelf misfits
  • Delivered in phases you approve
  • Support retainer from A$500/mo
On pricing

The audit fee comes off the build. If the audit finds nothing worth fixing, you keep the report and owe nothing further.

How an engagement runs

Five stages. You approve each one before the next starts.

  1. Diagnose

    A call, then a review of the store, the workflow and the numbers. You get a ranked list of problems. No build proposed yet.

    Week 1
  2. Scope

    Pick one problem. Define what changes, what stays, who supplies content and credentials, how many revisions, and where the project ends.

    Week 1
  3. Build

    Production-ready output, modular, delivered in phases. You see working progress, not a black box and a launch date.

    Weeks 2 to 6, typical
  4. Hand over

    Documentation, a recorded walkthrough and a warranty window. You own the code, the repository and every account.

    Launch week
  5. Support

    Optional retainer for fixes, improvements and continued optimisation. Month to month, cancel any time.

    Ongoing, from A$99/mo
The combination

Most developers understand code. Fewer understand a late delivery.

I run a store where the product dies if a parcel sits in a depot over a long weekend. Stock, fulfilment, refunds, seasonality and support load stopped being abstractions years ago.

That constraint shapes how I build. Systems get boundaries. Automated decisions get confidence thresholds and a human escalation path. Nothing ships on a promise it holds under load.

Straight answers

The questions people actually ask.

It is too expensive.
The real question is whether the current problem costs more than the fix. If a build recovers missed sales, saves staff hours or repairs follow-up, the benefit continues after the invoice. Where budget is tight, I reduce scope and solve the highest-value part first.
Make it cheaper?
I reduce scope, not quality. Removing the parts required to make a system work produces a build nobody uses. A smaller first phase beats a discount on the same workload.
We already have a developer.
Useful. I work alongside them and take the area they do not cover, usually conversion, AI or automation. Replacing something already working is rarely the right call.
AI feels risky.
Reasonable. I do not build uncontrolled AI decisions. Every system gets defined information sources, explicit boundaries, logging, and human escalation at the points where a wrong answer costs money. Auto-generated data below 0.90 confidence gets gated, not published.
We are too small for this.
Small businesses feel wasted time directly, because it lands on the owner. The solution should match the size. I would not recommend an operations rebuild when a A$299 audit and a contained sprint solve the immediate problem.
I need to think about it.
Of course. Tell me which part needs thinking through: cost, timing, scope, or confidence in the result. I would rather answer the real concern than chase you.
Next step

Start with the audit. Decide after you see the list.

A$299, delivered inside a week, credited against whatever gets built next. You get a ranked list of what costs you money and what it takes to fix each item.

The goal is not more software. The goal is less friction, recovered revenue, and your time back.